Ariana Grande Says ‘Holy S—’ in Response to Vogue Cover of Her With 6 Fingers That Appeared to Be AI-Altered

A significant online conversation has been ignited by the latest Vogue Japan cover, though the focus is not on fashion but on a glaring digital mistake. The publication's March 2026 issue features singer and actress Ariana Grande, but viewers were quick to spot a bizarre flaw: the image appeared to show her with six fingers on her left hand.

Grande, a multi-platinum artist known for her powerful vocal range and chart-dominating pop anthems, responded to the error with characteristic humor on social media. Commenting on a fan's Instagram post about the cover, she first wrote "holy shit," before adding, "oh my goodness how exciting ! i’ve been saying i need some extra appendages so that i can start an album ! thankful for this." This lighthearted reaction helped defuse potential criticism and showcased her relatable online persona.

By the following day, the photograph displayed on Vogue Japan's official website appeared to have been fixed, showing the standard five digits. The magazine's publisher, Condé Nast—a prestigious media conglomerate that also oversees titles like Architectural Digest and GQ—has not issued a public comment on the editing mishap. Industry analysts suggest such silent corrections are common practice to avoid drawing further attention to production errors.

The uncorrected image spread rapidly across social media, astonishing fans and becoming a viral talking point. This incident underscores the intense deadlines and complex digital workflows in modern magazine publishing, where such oversights can occur. As Luiza Jarovsky, a digital ethics expert and co-founder of the AI Tech & Privacy Academy, observed on X, "The level of AI slopification is so high that Ariana Grande has 6 fingers on the cover of Vogue Japan and NOBODY noticed it before publishing." Her comment points to a growing concern that over-reliance on automated editing tools, combined with human fatigue, can compromise quality control. Historically, similar retouching errors have plagued other major publications, but their frequency appears to be increasing in the digital age, challenging the perceived perfection of glossy media.