Japanese Boy Band Psychic Fever Wants You to Know They’re All ‘Different’: ‘We Don’t Want to Fit in a Box’
Show more
Anthony Hopkins Signed by Decca Classics; First Album of Music Composed by Oscar-Winning Actor Set for August Release
Show more
Music Industry Moves: T.I. Strikes Publishing Deal With Reservoir, Primary Wave Partners With Foreigner’s Mick Jones
Show more

RIAA, Grammys, SAG-AFTRA and Other Groups Launch New Labeling Program for AI Music

A powerful coalition of major music industry organizations—including the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA), the International Federation of the Phonographic Industry (IFPI), the Recording Academy (the body behind the Grammy Awards), and the actors' union SAG-AFTRA—has launched a new labeling system designed to clarify how artificial intelligence is used in music creation. Announced on Friday, the initiative proposes two distinct labels, visually similar to the familiar parental advisory stickers, to indicate whether a track is "AI-Generated" or "AI-Assisted." The goal is to establish a uniform, industry-wide transparency standard as AI-produced content becomes increasingly prevalent on digital streaming platforms. The Recording Academy, established in 1957 and best known for its annual Grammy Awards, has recently intensified its focus on technological shifts reshaping the music landscape.

"Music fans around the world place immense value on human artistry and authenticity," said IFPI CEO Vikki Oakley and RIAA Chairman and CEO Mitch Glazier in a joint statement. "These labels provide an immediately understandable and easily scalable approach to transparency. We recognize the many creative ways AI is being used, so we expect to offer fans more detailed information as the adoption of generative AI labeling grows and technology evolves." The labels operate at the track level, distinguishing between songs where the lead vocal and key instruments were generated by AI—or the entire piece was created from a simple prompt, earning the "AI-Generated" tag—and those where AI assisted with "some expressive elements" while humans composed the core work, labeled "AI-Assisted." Notably, the current framework does not address AI's involvement in lyrics, composition, music videos, or album artwork. Other partners include the American Association of Independent Music, the Worldwide Independent Network, the European Independents Association, and the Human Artistry Campaign, a coalition formed in 2023 to advocate for human creativity in the age of AI. This broad alliance reflects a growing recognition that clear labeling is essential to maintaining consumer trust in an era of rapid technological change.

This coordinated effort arrives amid a fragmented landscape where streaming services have adopted divergent approaches to AI labeling. Spotify and Apple Music, for instance, place the responsibility on artists to label their own work, while Tidal tags such tracks itself and withholds royalties from them. "As AI becomes more integrated into the creative process, artists and fans deserve a clear way to communicate how and when it's being used," said Grammys CEO Harvey Mason Jr. "This initiative ensures that creativity, authorship, and artistic intent remain at the center of every song. Giving artists the ability to tell that story strengthens trust and supports a more sustainable future for music." SAG-AFTRA's national executive director, Duncan Crabtree-Ireland, added: "Fans deserve to know when the music they hear is AI-generated or AI-assisted, and performers deserve a marketplace that recognizes, values, and protects human creativity. This framework is an important step toward giving listeners clear information. SAG-AFTRA continues to reinforce the principle that AI should not be used to replace, imitate, or exploit artists without consent and fair compensation." The union, which represents over 160,000 performers, has been particularly vocal about the risks AI poses to actors' and musicians' livelihoods, especially after the 2023 Hollywood strikes that highlighted similar concerns in the film industry.

This industry-wide initiative is a direct response to the rapid rise of AI music generators like Suno and Udio, which have sparked controversy over the use of artists' work to train their models and allegations of copyright infringement from record labels. In a statement on Friday, a Suno spokesperson acknowledged that "transparency is important" but argued that "it should be up to artists and platforms to decide how to treat these complex issues." The spokesperson noted that Suno has implemented tools such as watermarking and audio fingerprinting to "empower" artists to disclose their AI usage, adding: "This is a nuanced conversation that will require thoughtful solutions, which is why we're continuing to work with creatives, rightsholders, and platforms on approaches that protect artists while supporting human creativity." The labeling framework represents the music industry's most coordinated effort to date to address the challenges and opportunities presented by generative AI, though its effectiveness will ultimately depend on widespread adoption by streaming services and artists alike. As one industry analyst noted, the success of such voluntary standards often hinges on whether major platforms like Spotify and Apple Music choose to implement them consistently across their global catalogs, a decision that could shape the future of music consumption for years to come.

Category:SHOW BIZ NEWS
 
CALL ME BACK